2009 Nissan Titan vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,549 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (188 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Titan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (295 Nm @ 3050 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan Titan 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Nissan Jeep
Model Titan Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2009 2000
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5549 cc 3956 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 188 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 522 Nm 295 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3050 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5710 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 3560 mm 2770 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 16.8 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 106 L 87 L