2009 Nissan Titan vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Titan | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Titan | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |