2009 Nissan Titan vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,598 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.

Because 2009 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (385 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2009 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan Titan 2005 Renault Clio
Make Nissan Renault
Model Titan Clio
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Pickup Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5598 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 313 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 385 Nm 101 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1710 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 13.8 L/100km 5.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 19.6 L/100km 8.8 L/100km