2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. Both 2009 Nissan X-Trail and 1966 Nissan Cedric are equipped with a 1,997 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan X-Trail | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | X-Trail | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
