2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. 1996 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan X-Trail | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | X-Trail | SS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
