2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (75 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (100 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2002 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | X-Trail | Megane |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Top Speed | 182 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |