2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | X-Trail | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |