2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura CSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura CSX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura CSX. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | X-Trail | CSX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |