2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | X-Trail | CTS |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |