2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | X-Trail | STS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2957 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |
