2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Expedition (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. 2010 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | X-Trail | Expedition |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 106 L |