2009 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan X-Trail | 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | X-Trail | FJ Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1811 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |