2009 Opel Combo vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Opel Combo | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Opel | ZAZ |
Model | Combo | 966 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2170 mm |