2009 Opel Combo vs. 1984 Renault Siete
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault Siete would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1984 Renault Siete. (44 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault Siete.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault Siete. (85 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Opel Combo | 1984 Renault Siete | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Combo | Siete |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.4 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.6 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |