2009 Opel Combo vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Opel Combo (126 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 2009 Opel Combo has manual transmission. 2009 Opel Combo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Opel Combo | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Opel | Suzuki |
Model | Combo | F1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 45 L |