2009 Opel Combo vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Opel Combo would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Opel Combo | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Combo | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 43 L |