2009 Peugeot 1007 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Peugeot 1007. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Peugeot 1007 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 256 more horse power than 2009 Peugeot 1007. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2009 Peugeot 1007.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 1007, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Peugeot 1007. (149 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Peugeot 1007.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Peugeot 1007 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Peugeot | Holden |
| Model | 1007 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
