2009 Peugeot 206 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 206 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Peugeot 206 (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 347 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Peugeot 206 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Peugeot 206 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 206 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1227 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |