2009 Pontiac G3 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac G3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac G3 (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac G3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Pontiac G3 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Pontiac | Suzuki |
Model | G3 | Fronte |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |