2009 Pontiac G3 vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac G3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac G3 (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac G3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Pontiac G3 | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Pontiac | Smart |
Model | G3 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |