2009 Pontiac G3 vs. 2002 Proton 300
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac G3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac G3 (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac G3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Pontiac G3 | 2002 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Pontiac | Proton |
| Model | G3 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2450 mm |
