2009 Pontiac Solstice vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (173 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac Solstice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Pontiac Solstice | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
Model | Solstice | Corona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2384 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 75 L |