2009 Pontiac Torrent vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Torrent is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Torrent is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Torrent (264 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Torrent should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Torrent weights approximately 309 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac Torrent (339 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac Torrent will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2009 Pontiac Torrent has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Pontiac Torrent will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Pontiac Torrent | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Torrent | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |