2009 Pontiac Torrent vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Torrent is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Torrent is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Torrent (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Torrent should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Torrent weights approximately 99 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Pontiac Torrent is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Torrent will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac Torrent (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac Torrent will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Pontiac Torrent | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Pontiac | Rover |
Model | Torrent | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.5 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |