2009 Proton Arena vs. 1967 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2009 Proton Arena is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Proton Arena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Proton Arena (86 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Proton Arena should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Proton Arena weights approximately 55 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Proton Arena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Proton Arena (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Proton Arena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: