2009 Proton Arena vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2009 Proton Arena and 2009 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2009 Proton Arena. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2009 Proton Arena.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Proton Arena. (124 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Proton Arena | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Proton | Holden |
Model | Arena | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |