2009 Proton Arena vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Proton Arena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Proton Arena would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2009 Proton Arena. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2009 Proton Arena.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Proton Arena | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Proton | Nissan |
| Model | Arena | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4681 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
