2009 Renault Clio vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (152 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Renault | Simca |
Model | Clio | Aronde |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2450 mm |