2009 Renault Clio vs. 1956 Subaru K 111
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Subaru K 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Subaru K 111 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1956 Subaru K 111. (16 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 Subaru K 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1956 Subaru K 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1956 Subaru K 111 | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | Clio | K 111 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1310 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1810 mm |
