2009 Renault Clio vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (152 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Clio | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |