2009 Renault Clio vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Clio | 8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2280 mm |