2009 Renault Clio vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 37 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1460 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 54 L |
