2009 Renault Clio vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Clio | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |
