2009 Renault Clio vs. 1977 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 360 kg more than 1977 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1977 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1218 kg | 858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
