2009 Renault Clio vs. 1982 Lancia Trevi
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Trevi (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Lancia Trevi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Trevi. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Trevi. 1982 Lancia Trevi has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Lancia Trevi will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1982 Lancia Trevi | |
Make | Renault | Lancia |
Model | Clio | Trevi |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1460 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 52 L |