2009 Renault Clio vs. 1983 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki SJ 410.
Because 1983 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1983 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2040 mm |