2009 Renault Clio vs. 1984 TVR Tasmin
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 TVR Tasmin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 TVR Tasmin would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 TVR Tasmin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 840 kg more than 1984 TVR Tasmin.
Because 1984 TVR Tasmin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 TVR Tasmin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1984 TVR Tasmin | |
| Make | Renault | TVR |
| Model | Clio | Tasmin |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
