2009 Renault Clio vs. 1986 Subaru XT
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Subaru XT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Subaru XT would be higher. At 2,672 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Subaru XT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Subaru XT (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Subaru XT should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Subaru XT (211 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Subaru XT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 1986 Subaru XT | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | Clio | XT |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 211 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 67 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
