2009 Renault Clio vs. 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser (184 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |