2009 Renault Clio vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 710 kg more than 1991 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1452 cc |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |