2009 Renault Clio vs. 1996 Volvo V40

To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V40 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 400 kg more than 1996 Volvo V40.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo V40 (143 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Renault Clio 1996 Volvo V40
Make Renault Volvo
Model Clio V40
Year Released 2009 1996
Body Type Hatchback Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1390 cc 1588 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 143 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1640 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2570 mm