2009 Renault Clio vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 70 kg more than 1997 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (270 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio. 1997 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |