2009 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Clio | Kangoo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |