2009 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Clio | 2003 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 89.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |