2009 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (151 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | Clio | Micra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 46 L |
