2009 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 615 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (152 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Clio | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Renault | Mini |
| Model | Clio | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |
