2009 Renault Megane vs. 1965 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1965 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Megane | 1965 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Renault | Steyr |
Model | Megane | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1510 mm |