2009 Renault Megane vs. 1977 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1977 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1977 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1977 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Megane | 1977 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Megane | Cervo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2040 mm |