2009 Renault Megane vs. 1980 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1980 Talbot 1510. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1980 Talbot 1510.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Megane | 1980 Talbot 1510 | |
| Make | Renault | Talbot |
| Model | Megane | 1510 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 70 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
