2009 Renault Megane vs. 1981 Zastava 750
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750.
Because 1981 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Megane | 1981 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Renault | Zastava |
Model | Megane | 750 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2010 mm |